Royal documentary banned by the Queen since 1972 is on YouTube

Fly-on-wall royal documentary banned by the Queen since 1972 because it ‘cheapens her family’ reappears on YouTube – and includes moment she referred to US ambassador as ‘a gorilla’

  • A documentary about the royal family which was famously banned by the Queen from ever being shown after it’s initially airing has reappeared on YouTube
  • Queen banned the 1969 documentary from being shown again in 1972
  • Video, which was viewed by thousands, has sine been taken down from YouTube 

A controversial documentary about the royal family which was famously banned by the Queen from ever being shown again after it’s 1969 release has reappeared on YouTube.

In 1972, Her Majesty ordered the BBC’s fly on the wall documentary, which featured her calling the US ambassador ‘a gorilla’, to be locked away and not aired again as it ‘cheapens the royal family’.

However, weeks ago the full 110-minute programme, thought to be of Crown copyright, leaked on YouTube, with thousands of people watching the footage. 

‘This is a matter for the BBC. From time to time, things pop up on the internet that should not be there. We will assume it’s going to be taken down,’ a royal source told the Telegraph.

A BBC source added to the paper: ‘We will approach YouTube to have it removed. We always exercise our copyright where we can.

‘However, it is notoriously difficult to chase these things down on YouTube once they are out there. Anybody can download it and you just end up chasing your tail.’ 

A 1969 documentary about the royal family which was famously banned by the Queen from ever being shown after it’s initially airing has reappeared on YouTube. Pictured, Prince Charles and Princess Anne at dinner with The Queen and Prince Philip in the documentary

FEMAIL has contacted the BBC, Buckingham Palace and YouTube for comment. 

Buckingham Palace advised directly any questions to the BBC.  

A BBC spokesperson refused to comment to FEMAIL, however the video appears to now be taken down from YouTube. 

The video appears to have been uploaded to YouTube by by a new account in the name of Philip Strangeways, a reference to a mystery organisation called HM Government Public Service Films. 

The documentary, which is central to season 3 of The Crown was viewed by 45million people when first broadcast ahead to Prince Charles’ investiture. 

Called ‘Royal Family’, it was created to help the Windsors connect with their subjects.

The real film was a British phenomenon, watched over two weekends to rave reviews in June 1969, but was last shown three years later after Buckingham Palace feared it ‘let the magic out’ about the royals. 

Prince Charles, holding a cello instrument, pictured together with his younger brother Prince Edward (right) during filming of the television documentary ‘Royal Family’ in London in 1969

MailOnline previously unearthed three rare clips from the real thing where the Queen makes Prince Philip and Prince Charles roar with laughter as she describes the US Ambassador as a ‘gorilla’. 

Sparking hilarity over a cup of tea, she said: ‘It’s extremely difficult to keep a straight face when the Home Secretary said to me: “There’s a gorilla coming in”.’ 

‘So I said: “What an extraordinary remark to make about someone – very unkind”. I stood in the middle of the room and pressed the bell and the doors opened and there was a gorilla. He had a short body and long arms – I had the most appalling trouble [not laughing]’. 

The Home Secretary in 1969 was James Callaghan and the US Ambassador to the UK was Walter Annenberg – but it is not known if she was talking about those two men.

It could be Annenberg’s predecessor David K. E. Bruce, sent to London by John F Kennedy in 1961.  

The Queen and Prince Philip are shown decorating the Christmas tree in the 1969 documentary

The family are also seen meeting President Nixon, with the Queen commenting: ‘World problems are so complex, aren’t they now?’ 

In another scene five-year-old Prince Edward is taken to the shops with her mother to buy an ice cream – where she also smashes the falsehood that she never carries cash by paying with coins from her purse.

Her Majesty then giggles as her youngest son climbs into her car, making a mess on the seat with his lolly.

In the final scene the Queen, Prince Philip, Prince Charles  and Princess Anne head out for a barbecue where the Duke of Edinburgh sizzles some sausages while his wife unpacks the plates and cutlery with the heir to the throne, the Prince of Wales.  

During the scene, the Queen poked her little finger into the salad dressing, grimaced, and said: ‘Oh, too oily.’

The Queen regales an anecdote with Charles and Prince Philip (out of picture) where she admits the US Ambassador looked like a gorilla

After adding more vinegar, she walked over to her ­husband and announced: ‘Well, the salad is finished.’ Philip, gazing at his undercooked meat, responded brusquely: ‘Well done. This, as you will observe, is not.’

Philip’s use of the F-word in relation to the Queen’s corgis was edited out, but not his comments on his father-in-law, King George VI, now highly pertinent in the light of the acclaim being accorded to the film, The King’s Speech. ‘He had very odd habits,’ said Philip. ‘Sometimes I thought he was mad.

He described George VI, wearing on his head the full bearskin he used on parade at Trooping the Colour, hacking away savagely with a pruning knife in the royal gardens, and uttering, from the depth of a rhododendron bush the most incredible explosion of obscene language. 

Prince Charles, then only 21, also features heavily in the film. He is seen cycling, water-skiing, and fishing.

The outdoorsy side to the royal family is further emphasised, with the Queen feeding her horses carrots after Trooping the Colour.

The family are also seen meeting President Nixon, with the Queen commenting: ‘World problems are so complex, aren’t they now?’

More mundane things as part of everyday royal life are also shown.

The documentary shows how the family have lunch, at 1pm, and how food is pushed on a trolley from the Buckingham Palace basement through more than  ‘200 yards of corridors’ and then up in a life two floors to the Queen’s residence.

Her Majesty is also seen discussing outfits, and calls a Timur ruby necklace ‘fascinating’.

‘I think really, one should get a dress designed especially so that one could wear it,’ she tells her dresser.

Prince Philip also accompanies the Queen on the royal train in several scenes, with the couple reading newspapers and discussing how their lack of fluency in Portuguese. 

In episode four of season three The Crown, the royal family is shown taking part in the documentary which sees cameras follow them during their day-to-day lives, to prove how ‘normal’ they are.

The was a gale of laughter around the table led by Prince Philip who loved the joke by his wif

Olivia Colman’s Queen Elizabeth appears to cast an awkward glance as she sits with Princess Margaret, played by Helena Bonham Carter, and Marion Bailey as the Queen Mother. 

Helena’s Princess Margaret then quips: ‘This is nothing like a normal evening, if it was a normal evening we’d all be on our own in sad isolation in our individual palaces.

‘It wouldn’t be crowded like this, this is like some kind nightmare Christmas.’

However the programme was greeted with enthusiastic praise, not universally panned as The Crown suggests. 

The idea for the documentary came from the Palace’s new royal press secretary William Heseltine, rather than the Duke of Edinburgh, as the Netflix show claims.  

The Queen and Prince Philip fly back from a visit to Yorkshire in an Andover of the Queen’s Flight, in a photo taken during the filming of the joint ITV-BBC film documentary The Royal Family, 1969

Heseltine wanted to encourage public support for a monarchy that was increasingly seen as out-of-touch.

The programme was met with praise and proved so popular that it was aired again that same year and once more in 1972. 

But hasn’t been broadcast in full since but short clips from the documentary were made available as part of an exhibition for the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee 2012.

However, for the most past the original documentary remains under lock and key with researchers having to pay to view it at BBC HQ, only after getting permission from Buckingham Palace first.

In one scene, Prince Philip is seen painting in the ground of Buckingham Palace

‘You’re killing the monarchy, you know, with this film you’re making,’ the legendary anthropologist and wildlife expert David Attenborough wrote furiously in 1969 to the producer-director of the controversial and ground-breaking television documentary.

‘The whole institution depends on ­mystique and the tribal chief in his hut,’ continued Attenborough, then BBC 2 controller.

‘If any member of the tribe ever sees inside the hut, then the whole system of the tribal chiefdom is damaged and the tribe eventually disintegrates’, he said. 

Filmmaker Bryan Forbes said: ‘If you let the genie out of the bottle, you can never put the cork back again. And a lot of people think, with hindsight, that it was a mistake’.

The Queen is said to have ordered that the film should be withdrawn from circulation.

In The Crown, Ms Colman, centre as the Queen, Marion Bailey as the Queen Mother, left, and Helena Bonham Carter as Princess Margaret, right, sit down to watch the documentary Gogglebox style

Even now, nearly 50 years later, her attitude towards this misjudged experiment remains implacably negative. 

Even in an exhibition, The Queen: Art And Image, at the National Portrait ­Gallery, Buckingham Palace restricted the organisers to only a 90-­second clip from the film.

The other 104 minutes will remain unseen and off-limits, like the 38 hours of unused footage which is now held in the Royal Archives at Windsor, unavailable to the eyes of even serious historians and researchers

As the distinguished journalist Sir Peregrine Worsthorne observed at the time: ‘Initially the public will love seeing the Royal Family as not essentially different from anybody else and in the short term letting in the cameras will enhance the monarchy’s popularity. 

‘But in the not-so-long run familiarity will breed, if not contempt, well, familiarity.’

The Queen took part in the film on the advice of her new PR guru, not Prince Philip as claimed in The Crown, but she grew to dislike the film despite many rave reviews

In 2018, Robert Lacey, historical consultant on The Crown, explained to ABC’s The Story Of The Royals, why the family didn’t want the documentary shown.

‘They realised that if they did something like that too often, they would cheapen themselves, letting the magic seep out,’ he said. 

‘Some people say that this would open the floodgates, and therefore after that all the sort of tabloid interest in them [would come after],’ royal biographer Hugo Vickers added. 

‘They would want to know more, and more, and more.’

Source: Read Full Article